The ‘tag line’ in my sent emails reads “There is nothing more economically damaging that a set of beliefs lacking any underpinning in data, empiricism or common sense – any opinion asserted without evidence can be summarily dismissed without evidence. Matt McGee, Christopher Hitchens ”
I have long since gaped in astonishment and dismay at the recent inclusion of ‘faith’ and ‘religion’ as, respectively, ways and areas of knowing/knowledge in ToK. I pondered that for a few minutes and then looked up in which geographical areas the IB showed the most growth in students and/or schools. Uh-huh, you guessed it but maybe you should just look it up too. Tell me if you see a pattern that makes sense – as in common sense rather than the fat pink cloud of that last redoubt of wannabe-wisdom where we never actually know anything.
Enough, that is an issue for a separate round of slobbering fulmination. Here the issue is instead the extended essay (EE) update for first grades next year.
Economists have a tendency to see patterns where perhaps none exist. It’s been driven in to us over the years – we basically have a built-in propensity to scan our immediate (think ‘bounded’!) horizon and see links between societal happenings. And, yes; of course we fall victim to what we so often warn our students about, namely the trap of spurious or nonsense correlation.
With that caveat of self-awareness in mind, I simply must ask if anyone sees a link or pattern – not the same, I know – between the following three goings-on:
X: The recent crops of university students in the US and to a lesser degree in the UK. See – amongst quite a few acerbic articles – this article on the ‘Me-generation’ and this article on heightened political correctness.
Y: What seems to be the latest in-with-it-fashion trend at UK universities: here.
Anything? Links/patterns? To be continued.